🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.