🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold move to ban social media access for young people below 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, campaigners, and guardians are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising chorus of countries are moving toward similar bans.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister stating that phones and platforms are "stealing our children's childhood". Legislation could be enacted next year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media participants. Authorities have stated that an similar ban remains "a potential tools in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the president has called on lawmakers to pass a law increasing the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has recommended a related move, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has recommended families to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding resolution supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 without parental consent is provided. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"A strong age barrier is a solid starting point," said the parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a future ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but insisting any action must be "based on robust research".

Earlier, support grew behind a bill to enact controls on social media use by minors, but it was in the end modified. However, the government vowed to further research the issue.

Campaign organizations have expressed concerns. An organization established by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after being exposed to dangerous online content argues that a strict age ban may not make platforms safer and could create a "cliff edge" of harm when young people reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the social media companies to create tools that are safe and suitable for minors," said a influential online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Fragmented Picture

In the United States, regulation is primarily happening at the local government level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• The state of Utah mandates parental consent for under-18s to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has signed a bill barring children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a rule limiting under-16s to one hour of social media time per day, with extra time dependent on a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly passed measures demanding adult authorization for under-16s to set up social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from some individuals to follow this example, a nationwide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Views

Outside of these regions, further nations are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government intends to ban social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

However, global organizations adopt a more nuanced tone. Unicef has advised that social media bans carry risks and "may even have unintended consequences". The organization points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for marginalized children and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to prioritize safety.

Even as this global discussion unfolds, the actions of this nation and others indicate that policymakers globally are increasingly willing to wait for the industry to self-regulate.